Map what you actually hold
Most compliance work fails because nobody knows where personal data lives. We inventory it first — systems, fields, third parties, retention.
Security engineering
Cybersecurity & Compliance
Built to satisfy Indian data law from the first commit — not retrofitted after an audit.
What this covers
- Application and infrastructure security reviews with prioritised remediation
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 readiness: consent, notice, retention, erasure
- CERT-In aligned logging, log retention and incident-reporting workflows
- Data-flow mapping and classification across your systems
- Access governance: roles, least privilege, audit trails
- ISO 27001 and SOC 2 groundwork for teams heading toward certification
- Secure SDLC: dependency scanning, secret detection, review gates
What you walk away with
- Prioritised findings report with reproduction steps and fixes
- Data inventory and processing map
- Consent, retention and erasure implemented in the product
- Incident-response runbook and reporting workflow
- Re-test after remediation
How we work
Fix by severity, not by list length
Findings are ranked by real exploitability and regulatory exposure, so limited engineering time goes to what matters.
Encode it in the build
Consent flows, retention jobs, access controls and audit logging land in the codebase and CI, so compliance doesn't decay between reviews.
Leave the paperwork behind
Policies, data-flow diagrams, breach-response runbooks and evidence — the documentation a regulator or enterprise client will ask for.
Frequently asked
Do you provide legal opinions on data protection law?
No — legal interpretation is delivered through vetted partner professionals. We handle the engineering: building the controls, logging and workflows that a compliant posture requires, and documenting them for review.
What does DPDP readiness actually involve?
Practically: knowing what personal data you hold and why, capturing consent in a demonstrable way, honouring erasure and correction requests, limiting retention, restricting internal access, and being able to detect and report a breach. We implement each of those in the product itself.
We're pre-revenue. Is this premature?
The inexpensive time to build consent, retention and access control is before you have users. Retrofitting them across a live database with real records is materially harder and riskier.
Request a security review.
Tell us what you're trying to solve — we'll scope it honestly, including whether it's worth doing.