Find the expensive task
We start with the workflow that consumes the most hours or leaks the most revenue — not with the model. If automation doesn't pay for itself, we say so before you spend.
Agents that do the work, not demos that describe it.
We start with the workflow that consumes the most hours or leaks the most revenue — not with the model. If automation doesn't pay for itself, we say so before you spend.
A narrow prototype against your actual documents and edge cases, scored against a held-out set. You see accuracy before scope, not after.
Confidence thresholds, fallback paths, and a review queue for low-confidence outputs. The agent escalates rather than guesses.
Logged runs, accuracy tracking, and a feedback loop that improves prompts and retrieval over time.
Whichever fits the task and the budget — we're model-agnostic and design so the provider can be swapped without a rewrite. Selection is driven by accuracy on your data, latency, and cost per run.
No. We use enterprise API tiers with training disabled, and for sensitive workloads we architect around self-hosted or in-region models instead. Data handling is documented before we start. If processing location is a hard requirement rather than a preference, see our AI Workforce page — that is the same engineering under a stricter constraint.
That's designed for from day one. Confidence thresholds route uncertain outputs to a human review queue, every run is logged, and we agree accuracy targets before shipping rather than hoping for the best.
Tell us what you're trying to solve — we'll scope it honestly, including whether it's worth doing.